Quality of Life Assessment Using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Questionnaire in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 31 (6) , 639-643
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000202744.48633.44
Abstract
Clinical outcome study comparing the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) assessment scales in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). To compare the validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the SF-12 and SF-36 scales in CSM patients undergoing decompressive surgery. The SF-36 is a generic Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) questionnaire, consisting of 36 questions that can be reported as a Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Recently, an abbreviated version of SF-36, the SF-12, which uses only 12 questions drawn from the SF-36, has been described. In this prospective study, patients with CSM undergoing decompressive surgery, self-completed the SF-36 questionnaire before surgery and at 6 months after surgery. SF-12 item responses were abstracted from the responses given to the SF-36 questionnaire. The validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the PCS and MCS components of SF-12 and SF-36 scales were compared. Overall, 105 patients underwent anterior (N = 58) or posterior (N = 47) decompressive surgery. After surgery, there were improvements in the PCS components of both the SF-36 (40 +/- 2 to 54 +/- 2) and SF-12 (34 +/- 2 to 48 +/- 3), as well as in the MCS component of the SF-36 (48 +/- 2 to 63 +/- 2) and SF-12 (43 +/- 2 to 59 +/- 2) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity to change and absolute sensitivity for both SF-12 and SF-36 were comparable, but the reliability of SF-36 was marginally greater. There were close and linear correlations between the SF-36 and SF-12 scores for both the PCS and MCS components, before and after surgery (R = 0.86 to 0.93; P < 0.0001). Both the SF-12 and SF-36 scales are valid and sensitive to changes in physical and mental health status in CSM patients, undergoing decompressive surgery. Despite its abbreviated nature, the SF-12 appears to be an adequate substitute for SF-36, and its brevity should increase its attractiveness to both clinicians and patients.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Validity and reliability of the Short Form—36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathyJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2002
- Measurement of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgicallyBritish Journal Of Neurosurgery, 2002
- Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic my elopathy by a simple walking testThe Lancet, 1999
- Development of a functional scoring system for rheumatoid arthritis patients with cervical myelopathy.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1996
- A 12-Item Short-Form Health SurveyMedical Care, 1996
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathyNeurology, 1992
- Neurologic Complications of Surgery for Cervical Compression MyelopathySpine, 1991
- THE PATHOGENESIS OF THE SPINAL CORD DISORDER ASSOCIATED WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOSISBrain, 1972