Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Current Era Compared With 1985–1986
- 12 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 102 (24) , 2945-2951
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.24.2945
Abstract
Background—Although refinements have occurred in coronary angioplasty over the past decade, little is known about whether these changes have affected outcomes. Methods and Results—Baseline features and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of 1559 consecutive patients in the 1997–1998 Dynamic Registry who were having first coronary intervention were compared with 2431 patients in the 1985–1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. Compared with patients in the 1985–1986 Registry, Dynamic Registry patients were older (mean age, 62 versus 58 years; P<0.001) and more often female (32.1% versus 25.5%; P<0.001). In the Dynamic Registry, procedures were more often performed for acute myocardial infarction (22.9% versus 9.9%; P<0.001) and treated lesions were more severe (84.5% versus 82.5% diameter reduction; P<0.001), thrombotic (22.1% versus 11.3%; P<0.001) or calcified (29.5% versus 10.8%; P<0.001). Stents were used in 70.5% of Dynamic Registry patients, whereas 1985–1986 patients received balloon an...Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Clinical Outcome after Widespread Use of Coronary-Artery Stenting in CanadaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Use and Overuse of Angiography and Revascularization for Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- A Comparison of Thrombolytic Therapy with Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Cisapride and Fatal ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Referral for coronary artery revascularization procedures after diagnostic coronary angiography: Evidence for gender bias?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Coronary angioplasty after recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: A report from the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trialJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the “culprit lesion” for management of unstable angina pectoris in patients with multivessel coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986