A comparative assessment of the employment consequences of UK and West German aid
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Review of Applied Economics
- Vol. 4 (1) , 25-27
- https://doi.org/10.1080/758529332
Abstract
This paper applies standard input-output methodology to estimate the employment affects of aid flows for the UK and the FRG. The conclusion is at variance with what some other economists have claimed earlier in that it shows that aid flows to developing countries do not generate a lot of jobs at home. Indeed, it is estimated that they generate fewer jobs than alternative uses of money at home, hence this paper contends that the argument of ‘self-interest’ for channelling aid to developing countries does not hold water. It is concluded that overseas development aid as a tool of alleviating domestic problems (unemployment, regional problems etc.) is pretty ineffective and aid allocation priorities should be based on grounds other than those of domestic economic considerations.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economic Aid: an Obsession with EfficiencyJournal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 1988
- A Micro‐economic Study of the Effects of Overseas Development Aid on British Companies 1979–83Development Policy Review, 1987
- The economic consequences of reduced UK military expenditureCambridge Journal of Economics, 1984
- A Measure of `Export Similarity' and Its Possible UsesThe Economic Journal, 1979
- The Economic Impact--Industrial and Regional--Of An Arms CutThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1965
- The Economic Effects of DisarmamentScientific American, 1961