How profitable is risk selection? A comparison of four risk adjustment models
- 27 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 11 (2) , 165-174
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.661
Abstract
To mitigate selection triggered by capitation payments, risk‐adjustment models bring capitation payments closer on average to individuals' expected expenditure. We examine the maximum potential profit that plans could hypothetically gain by using their own private information to select low‐cost enrollees when payments are made using four commonly used risk adjustment models. Simulations using a privately insured sample suggest that risk selection profits remain substantial. The magnitude of potential profit varies according to the risk adjustment model and the private information plans can employ to identify profitable enrollees. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal Risk Adjustment in Markets with Adverse Selection: An Application to Managed CareAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Much ado about two: reconsidering retransformation and the two-part model in health econometricsJournal of Health Economics, 1998
- The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problemJournal of Health Economics, 1998
- Risk Adjustment for Health Insurance: Theory and ImplicationsJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1998
- Risk Adjustment And Medicare: Taking A Closer LookHealth Affairs, 1997
- Differences in the Mix of Patients Among Medical Specialties and Systems of CareJAMA, 1992
- Selection Bias in TEFRA At-Risk HMOsMedical Care, 1991
- Biased Selection and Regression toward the Mean in Three Medicare HMO Demonstrations: A Survival Analysis of Enrollees and DisenrolleesMedical Care, 1989
- Smearing Estimate: A Nonparametric Retransformation MethodJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- Simulation of a Health Insurance Market with Adverse SelectionOperations Research, 1982