Evolutionary traction: the cost of adaptation and the evolution of sex
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Vol. 18 (2) , 309-314
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00858.x
Abstract
The advantage of sexual reproduction remains a puzzle for evolutionary biologists. Everything else being equal, asexual populations are expected to have twice the number of offspring produced by similar sexual populations. Yet, asexual species are uncommon among higher eukaryotes. In models assuming small populations, high mutation rates, or frequent environmental changes, sexual reproduction seems to have at least a two‐fold advantage over asexuality. But the advantage of sex for large populations, low mutation rates, and rare or mild environmental changes remains a conundrum. Here we show that without recombination, rare advantageous mutations can result in increased accumulation of deleterious mutations (‘evolutionary traction’), which explains the long‐term advantage of sex under a wide parameter range.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptive protein evolution in DrosophilaNature, 2002
- Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from DrosophilaNature, 2002
- Sexual Recombination and the Power of Natural SelectionScience, 2001
- Genetic hitchhikingPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- The degeneration of Y chromosomesPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000
- Deleterious Mutations and the Evolution of SexScience, 2000
- The constraints of finite size in asexual populations and the rate of the ratchetGenetics Research, 1995
- Pathogens and sex in plantsEvolutionary Ecology, 1994
- The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variantsGenetics Research, 1994
- Sex versus Non-Sex versus ParasiteOikos, 1980