The Psychiatrist and Peer Review: A Psychodynamic Perspective
- 26 June 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 27 (2) , 319-323
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00048679309075784
Abstract
Consideration of peer review is timely, given that formalisation of peer review processes is one of the responses the psychiatric profession could make to increasing calls for accountability from within and without the profession. The establishment of formal peer review evoked strong, often hostile, responses among psychiatrists in the United States, reflecting considerable underlying anxiety. This paper examines the responses to formal peer review in psychiatrists from a psychodynamic perspective.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A psychodynamic perspective on the clinical impact of insurance reviewAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1991
- The process of reviewing peersGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 1989
- Peer Review: Empirical Data Base and Practical ImplicationsThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1988
- Problems, protests, and proposals.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1987
- Peer Review, Third-Party Payment, and The Analytic Situation: A Case ReportJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1984
- Survey of Psychoanalytic Practice 1976; Some Trends and ImplicationsJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1978
- Effects of peer review on outpatient psychotherapy: therapist and patient follow-up surveyAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1976