Controlling morpholino experiments: don't stop making antisense
Top Cited Papers
- 15 May 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Development
- Vol. 135 (10) , 1735-1743
- https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.001115
Abstract
One of the most significant problems facing developmental biologists who do not work on an organism with well-developed genetics - and even for some who do - is how to inhibit the action of a gene of interest during development so as to learn about its normal biological function. A widely adopted approach is to use antisense technologies, and especially morpholino antisense oligonucleotides. In this article, we review the use of such reagents and present examples of how they have provided insights into developmental mechanisms. We also discuss how the use of morpholinos can lead to misleading results, including off-target effects, and we suggest controls that will allow researchers to interpret morpholino experiments correctly.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- MicroRNA Mirn140 modulates Pdgf signaling during palatogenesisNature Genetics, 2008
- Maternal nodal and zebrafish embryogenesisNature, 2007
- A case study of the reproducibility of transcriptional reporter cell-based RNAi screens in DrosophilaGenome Biology, 2007
- Vagaries of conditional gene targetingNature Immunology, 2007
- The zebrafish dorsal axis is apparent at the four-cell stageNature, 2005
- Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’Nature, 2005
- Full-genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegansNature, 2005
- Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAiNature, 2003
- Inhibition of zebrafish fgf8 pre‐mRNA splicing with morpholino oligos: A quantifiable method for gene knockdownGenesis, 2001
- Effective targeted gene ‘knockdown’ in zebrafishNature Genetics, 2000