Position Statement on Human Aging
Open Access
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
- Vol. 57 (8) , B292-B297
- https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/57.8.b292
Abstract
A large number of products are currently being sold by antiaging entrepreneurs who claim that it is now possible to slow, stop, or reverse human aging. The business of what has become known as antiaging medicine has grown in recent years in the United States and abroad into a multimillion-dollar industry. The products being sold have no scientifically demonstrated efficacy, in some cases they may be harmful, and those selling them often misrepresent the science upon which they are based. In the position statement that follows, 52 researchers in the field of aging have collaborated to inform the public of the distinction between the pseudoscientific antiaging industry, and the genuine science of aging that has progressed rapidly in recent years.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extending Life: Scientific Prospects and Political ObstaclesThe Milbank Quarterly, 2002
- Molecular mechanisms of ageing in connective tissuesMechanisms of Ageing and Development, 2001
- Prospects for Human LongevityScience, 2001
- Age-Related Changes in the Biochemical Properties of Human Cancellous Bone Collagen: Relationship to Bone StrengthCalcified Tissue International, 1999
- How and why we ageExperimental Gerontology, 1998
- A biologically motivated partitioning of mortalityExperimental Gerontology, 1997
- Continuing the Search for a Law of MortalityPopulation and Development Review, 1996
- In Search of Methuselah: Estimating the Upper Limits to Human LongevityScience, 1990
- The measurement of Darwinian fitness in human populationsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1984
- Aging, Natural Death, and the Compression of MorbidityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980