Fifteen Years after “Wingspread”—Environmental Endocrine Disrupters and Human and Wildlife Health: Where We are Today and Where We Need to Go
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 16 February 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Toxicological Sciences
- Vol. 105 (2) , 235-259
- https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfn030
Abstract
In 1991, a group of expert scientists at a Wingspread work session on endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) concluded that “Many compounds introduced into the environment by human activity are capable of disrupting the endocrine system of animals, including fish, wildlife, and humans. Endocrine disruption can be profound because of the crucial role hormones play in controlling development.” Since that time, there have been numerous documented examples of adverse effects of EDCs in invertebrates, fish, wildlife, domestic animals, and humans. Hormonal systems can be disrupted by numerous different anthropogenic chemicals including antiandrogens, androgens, estrogens, AhR agonists, inhibitors of steroid hormone synthesis, antithyroid substances, and retinoid agonists. In addition, pathways and targets for endocrine disruption extend beyond the traditional estrogen/androgen/thyroid receptor–mediated reproductive and developmental systems. For example, scientists have expressed concern about the potential role of EDCs in increasing trends in early puberty in girls, obesity and type II diabetes in the United States and other populations. New concerns include complex endocrine alterations induced by mixtures of chemicals, an issue broadened due to the growing awareness that EDCs present in the environment include a variety of potent human and veterinary pharmaceutical products, personal care products, nutraceuticals and phytosterols. In this review we (1) address what have we learned about the effects of EDCs on fish, wildlife, and human health, (2) discuss representative animal studies on (anti)androgens, estrogens and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin–like chemicals, and (3) evaluate regulatory proposals being considered for screening and testing these chemicals.Keywords
This publication has 176 references indexed in Scilit:
- Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- The OECD Program to Validate the Rat Hershberger Bioassay to Screen Compounds for in Vivo Androgen and Antiandrogen Responses: Phase 2 Dose–Response StudiesEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2007
- The immune system as a target for environmental chemicals: Xenoestrogens and other compoundsToxicology Letters, 2006
- Evaluation of Reproductive Development Following Intravenous and Oral Exposure to DEHP in Male Neonatal RatsInternational Journal of Toxicology, 2003
- Characterization of potential endocrine-related health effects at low-dose levels of exposure to PCBs.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1999
- Effects of Pesticides and Toxic Substances On Behavioral and Morphological Reproductive Development: Endocrine Versus Nonendocrine MechanismsToxicology and Industrial Health, 1998
- Persistent DDT metabolite p,p'–DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagonistNature, 1995
- The affinity of procymidone to androgen receptor in rats and mice.The Journal of Toxicological Sciences, 1993
- Uterotropic action in rats of amsonic acid and three of its synthetic precursorsJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1992
- Testicular toxicity and reduced sertoli cell numbers in neonatal rats by di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and the recovery of fertility as adultsToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1988