Libertarianism, postlibertarianism, and the welfare state: Reply to Friedman
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Review
- Vol. 6 (1) , 45-82
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819208443253
Abstract
Jeffrey Friedman broaches a number of criticisms of Libertarianism as a conceptual basis for opposing the extensive modern welfare state, examining several variants and concluding that they are fundamentally unsupported. He opts for a “consequentialist” view of foundations. Nevertheless, he thinks that the modem welfare state is subject to effective critique along such lines. But rational contractarian individualism works and does provide foundations for libertarianism, while “consequentialism” is an ill‐defined theory.that is quite unpromising for the proposed critique; nevertheless, Friedman's empirical and economic critique of the welfare state is valid.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The new consensus: II. The democratic welfare stateCritical Review, 1990
- The new consensus: I. The Fukuyama thesisCritical Review, 1989
- Gewirth'sReason and Morality– A Study in the Hazards of Universalizability in EthicsDialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue Canadienne de Philosophie, 1980
- A Puzzle about Economic Justice in Rawls’ TheorySocial Theory and Practice, 1976
- Negative and Positive FreedomThe Philosophical Review, 1967
- Morality and UtilityPublished by Project MUSE ,1967
- Utilitarianism and formalismAustralasian Journal of Philosophy, 1965