Epidemiology of sedation and sedation adequacy for mechanically ventilated patients in a medical and surgical intensive care unit*
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 35 (2) , 393-401
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000254339.18639.1d
Abstract
Describe the pharmacoepidemiology of sedative medications and nurse-rated patients' behavior and sedation adequacy. Cohort study, 2001-2003. Patients ventilated for >36 hrs in a medical or surgical intensive care unit at a university-affiliated hospital. Proxies for 312 eligible subjects were approached for consent, 277 subjects enrolled, and data from 274 subjects were analyzed. None. Distribution of Arousal and Motor Activity levels, proportion of inadequate sedation and factors associated with inadequate sedation, variation of sedative therapy intensity, and behavior over time were measured. Sedatives were administered in 85% of 18,050 four-hour intervals during mechanical ventilation. Sedation was judged as adequate in 83% of 12,414 sedation assessments; patients were judged to be undersedated in 13.9% and oversedated in 2.6% of the assessments. Patients were unarousable or minimally arousable 32% of the time and had no spontaneous motor activity (during a 10-min observation period) 21.5% of the time. There was little variation in level of consciousness or motor activity or drug dose over 24 hrs, but daytime caregivers were more likely to judge patients as oversedated (3.7%) compared with nighttime caregivers (1.6%, p<.001). Inadequate sedation was associated with sedative drug intensity and patient behavior as measured by a two-domain sedation scale. Sedative drug intensity and behavior varied during the course of respiratory failure, and survivors received 13% more sedation per 4-hr interval of mechanical ventilation than nonsurvivors (p<.001). Although patients were minimally arousable or nonarousable in 32% and motionless in 21% of the sedation assessments, surprisingly, an oversedation rating occurred in <3%. This discrepancy, along with findings that time of day influences the interpretation of sedation adequacy and that patients' behavior change over time suggests that collaborative research is needed to define adequate sedation.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Sedatives and Neuromuscular Blockers in a Cohort of Patients Receiving Mechanical VentilationChest, 2005
- Survey of routines for sedation of patients on controlled ventilation in Nordic intensive care unitsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2004
- Intensive care sedation of mechanically ventilated patients: a national Swedish surveyIntensive and Critical Care Nursing, 2003
- National Survey of the Use of Sedating Drugs, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, and Reversal Agents in the Intensive Care UnitJournal of Intensive Care Medicine, 2003
- Quality improvement report: Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients' need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unitBMJ, 2002
- Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European surveyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001
- Intensive care sedation: a review of current British practiceIntensive Care Medicine, 2000
- Daily Interruption of Sedative Infusions in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Mechanical VentilationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilationCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- The Brussels sedation scale: use of a simple clinical sedation scale can avoid excessive sedation in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unitBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1999