Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 23 January 2013
- Vol. 346 (jan23 1) , f158
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f158
Abstract
Objective To elicit women’s responses to information about the nature and extent of overdiagnosis in mammography screening (detecting disease that would not present clinically during the woman’s lifetime) and explore how awareness of overdiagnosis might influence attitudes and intentions about screening. Design Qualitative study using focus groups that included a presentation explaining overdiagnosis, incorporating different published estimates of its rate (1–10%, 30%, 50%) and information on the mortality benefit of screening, with guided group discussions Setting Sydney, Australia Participants Fifty women aged 40–79 years with no personal history of breast cancer and with varying levels of education and participation in screening. Results Prior awareness of breast cancer overdiagnosis was minimal. Women generally reacted with surprise, but most came to understand the issue. Responses to overdiagnosis and the different estimates of its magnitude were diverse. The highest estimate (50%) made some women perceive a need for more careful personal decision making about screening. In contrast, the lower and intermediate estimates (1–10% and 30%) had limited impact on attitudes and intentions, with many women remaining committed to screening. For some women, the information raised concerns, not about whether to screen but whether to treat a screen detected cancer or consider alternative approaches (such as watchful waiting). Information preferences varied: many women considered it important to take overdiagnosis into account and make informed choices about whether to have screening, but many wanted to be encouraged to be screened. Conclusions Women from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds could comprehend the issue of overdiagnosis in mammography screening, and they generally valued information about it. Effects on screening intentions may depend heavily on the rate of overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis will be new and counterintuitive for many people and may influence screening and treatment decisions in unintended ways, underscoring the need for careful communication.This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohortsBMC Cancer, 2011
- Interpreting Overdiagnosis Estimates in Population-based Mammography ScreeningEpidemiologic Reviews, 2011
- A limited review of over diagnosis methods and long-term effects in breast cancer screeningOncology Reviews, 2011
- Screening for breast cancer: Medicalization, visualization and the embodied experienceHealth: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 2010
- The views of older women towards mammographic screening: a qualitative and quantitative studyBritish Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Who evaluates public health programmes? A review of the NHS Breast Screening ProgrammeJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2010
- An estimate of overdiagnosis 15 years after the start of mammographic screening in FlorenceEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2009
- Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research noteQualitative Research, 2008
- Factors influencing elderly women's mammography screening decisions: implications for counselingBMC Geriatrics, 2007
- Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programsPatient Education and Counseling, 2006