Multi-Arm Clinical Trials of New Agents: Some Design Considerations
Open Access
- 15 July 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 14 (14) , 4368-4371
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0325
Abstract
A major challenge in the development of anticancer therapies is the considerable time and resources needed for conducting randomized clinical trials (RCT). There is a need for more efficient RCT designs that accelerate development, minimize costs, and make trials more appealing to patients. We review the statistical and logistical characteristics of multi-arm designs that compare several experimental treatments to a common control arm. In particular, we present a rationale for not requiring multiplicity adjustment in multi-arm trials that are designed for logistical efficiency. Relative to conducting separate RCTs for each experimental agent, this multi-arm design is shown to require a lower total sample size than multiple two-arm trials.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical trials in ovarian carcinoma: study methodologyAnnals of Oncology, 2005
- Effect of Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Breast Cancer in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- The Phase III Trial in the Era of Targeted Therapy: Unraveling the “Go or No Go” DecisionJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Zoledronic Acid Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Skeletal Metastases in Patients With Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors: A Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial—The Zoledronic Acid Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Randomized, Multinational, Phase III Study of Docetaxel Plus Platinum Combinations Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The TAX 326 Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Can unequal be more fair? Ethics, subject allocation, and randomised clinical trials.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1998
- Multiplicity Considerations in the Design and Analysis of Clinical TrialsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1996
- Multiple Comparisons with Control in a Single Experiment versus Separate Experiments: Why Do We Feel Differently?The American Statistician, 1995
- Comparing the Means of Several GroupsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a ControlJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1955