The Small-Sample Bias of the Gini Coefficient: Results and Implications for Empirical Research
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Vol. 85 (1) , 226-234
- https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2003.85.1.226
Abstract
The Gini coefficient is a downward-biased measure of inequality in small populations when income is generated by one of three common distributions. The paper discusses the sources of bias and argues that this property is far more general. This has implications for (i) the comparison of inequality among subsamples, some of which may be small, and (ii) the use of the Gini in measuring firm size inequality in markets with a small number of firms. The small-sample bias has often led to misperceptions about trends in industry concentration. A small-sample adjustment results in a reduced bias, which can no longer be signed. This remaining bias rises with the dispersion and falls with increasing skewness of the distribution. Finally, an empirical example illustrates the importance of using the adjusted Gini. In this example it is shown that, controlling for market characteristics, larger shipping cartels include a set of firms that is stochastically identical (in terms of relative size) to those of smaller shipping cartels. © 2003 President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Status, Entry and Predation: The Case of British Shipping Cartels 1879–1929Journal of Industrial Economics, 1999
- Entry and Predation: British Shipping Cartels 1879–1929Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1997
- Decision Making under Uncertainty When the Stakes Are High: Evidence from a Lottery Game ShowSouthern Economic Journal, 1997
- Monte Carlo Methodology and the Finite Sample Properties of Instrumental Variables Statistics for Testing Nested and Non-Nested HypothesesEconometrica, 1991
- PRACTITIONERS' CORNER* Calculating The Gini Index Of inequality For Individual DataOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1985
- A reply to Professors Maasoumi and PhillipsJournal of Econometrics, 1982
- On the behavior of inconsistent instrumental variable estimatorsJournal of Econometrics, 1982
- Predatory Price Cutting: Notes and CommentsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1972
- Variance Formulas for the Mean Difference and Coefficient of ConcentrationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1962
- The Analysis of Business Concentration: A Statistical ApproachJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1956