Gender differences in evaluation of performance and leadership ability: Autocratic vs. democratic managers
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Sex Roles
- Vol. 35 (5-6) , 337-361
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01664773
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicantsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1988
- Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- Leadership and Followership: Some Summary PropositionsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1982
- Sex effects on performance ratings on manager-subordinate dyads: A field study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- Attributional processes of leaders in leader—Member interactionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979
- Measuring causal attibutions for success and failure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Sex differences in the appropriateness of supervisory styles: A nonmanagement view.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attributions, and perceived likelihood of different consequences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- An Experimental Approach to the Study of Autocracy and Democracy: A Preliminary NoteSociometry, 1938