Judgments of Change and Proportion in Graphical Perception
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 34 (3) , 313-334
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400306
Abstract
Subjects judged change and proportion when viewing graphs in two experiments. Change was judged more quickly and accurately with line and bar graphs than with pie charts or tiered bar graphs, and this difference was larger when the rate of change was smaller. Without a graduated scale, proportion was judged more quickly and accurately with pie charts and divided bar graphs than with line or bar graphs. Perception is direct when it requires simpler or fewer mental operations; we propose that perception of change is direct with line and bar graphs, whereas perception of proportion is direct with pie charts and divided bar graphs. The results are also consistent with the proximity compatibility principle. Suggestions for improving the design of graphical displays are given.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrated displays and the perception of graphical dataErgonomics, 1991
- Displaying proportions and percentagesApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1991
- Proximity Compatibility and Information Display: Effects of Color, Space, and Objectness on Information IntegrationHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1990
- An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph PerceptionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Information integration and the object display An interaction of task demands and display superiorityErgonomics, 1987
- Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical MethodsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977
- THEORIES AND EXPERIMENTS ON DISCRIMINATION TIMESErgonomics, 1964
- An Evaluation of Formats for Graphic Trend Displays—Experiment IIHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1961
- The Relative Merits of Circles and Bars for Representing Component PartsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1926