Target space for structural genomics revisited
Open Access
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 18 (7) , 922-933
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.7.922
Abstract
Motivation: Structural genomics eventually aims at determining structures for all proteins. However, in the beginning experimentalists are likely to focus on globular proteins to achieve a rapid basic coverage of protein sequence space. How many proteins will structural genomics have to target? How many proteins will be excluded since we already have structural information for these or since they are not globular? We have to answer these questions in the context of our target selection for the North-East Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG). Results: We estimated that structural information is available for about 6–38% of all proteins; 6% if we require high accuracy in comparative modelling, 38% if we are satisfied with having a rough idea about the fold. Excluding all regions that are not globular, we found that structural genomics may have to target about 48% of all proteins. This corresponded to a similar percentage of residues of the entire proteomes (52%). We explored a number of different strategies to cluster protein space in order to find the number of families representing these 48% of structurally unknown proteins. For the subset of all entirely sequenced eukaryotes, we found over 18 000 fragment clusters each of which may be a suitable target for structural genomics. Availability: All data are available from the authors, most results are summarized at: http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/genomes/RES/2002_bioinformatics/ Contact: rost@columbia.edu * To whom correspondence should be addressed.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomesJournal of Molecular Biology, 2001
- An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. II. On the relationship between sequence and structural similarity for proteins that are not obviously related in sequenceJournal of Molecular Biology, 2000
- An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distanceJournal of Molecular Biology, 2000
- An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments 1 1Edited by F. E. CohenJournal of Molecular Biology, 2000
- From fold to functionCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology, 2000
- Benchmarking PSI-BLAST in genome annotation 1 1Edited by G. von HeijneJournal of Molecular Biology, 1999
- Do aligned sequences share the same fold?Journal of Molecular Biology, 1997
- CATH – a hierarchic classification of protein domain structuresPublished by Elsevier ,1997
- Protein structures sustain evolutionary driftFolding and Design, 1997
- Database of homology‐derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignmentProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 1991