Toward a new definition of readability
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Psychologist
- Vol. 17 (1) , 13-30
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528209529241
Abstract
Within a general framework of structure‐of‐text research, a new definition of readability is proposed, based on three textual variables: structure, “texture,” and informational density of text. For structure, three kinds of superstructures and three categories of sectional structures are described, and various combinations of these are placed on a gradient of difficulty. For “texture,” or explicitness, a continuum is sketched. Informational density is described in general terms. Empirical evidence for each of the proposed variables is reviewed. The interactions of reader and textual variables in the act of comprehension are discussed, the reader variables being world knowledge and ability to use learning strategies. A number of hypotheses for future research on readability are presented, and implications for teaching are suggested.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrating Information From Text: An Evaluation of Current TheoriesReview of Educational Research, 1980
- The Role of Elaboration in the Comprehension and Retention of Prose: A Critical ReviewReview of Educational Research, 1980
- Good Reading for Poor ReadersEducational Researcher, 1978
- The Effects of Extraneous Speech on Visual Vigilance Performance of ChildrenChild Development, 1978
- Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it.American Psychologist, 1974
- Effect of prose organization upon free recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973
- Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentencesCognitive Psychology, 1973
- Integration of written text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973
- Organization of prose materials: Stimulus, storage, and retrieval.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1973
- Sentence structure and retention in good and poor readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971