Maloriented Bivalents Have Metaphase Positions at the Spindle Equator with More Kinetochore Microtubules to One Pole than to the Other
Open Access
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) in Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Vol. 15 (12) , 5346-5355
- https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04-06-0524
Abstract
To test the “traction fiber” model for metaphase positioning of bivalents during meiosis, kinetochore fibers of maloriented bivalents, induced during recovery from cold arrest, were analyzed with a liquid crystal polarizing microscope. The measured birefringence retardation of kinetochore fibers is proportional to the number of microtubules in a fiber. Five of the 11 maloriented bivalents analyzed exhibited bipolar malorientations that had at least four times more kinetochore microtubules to one pole than to the other pole, and two had microtubules directed to only one pole. Yet all maloriented bivalents had positions at or near the spindle equator. The traction fiber model predicts such maloriented bivalents should be positioned closer to the pole with more kinetochore microtubules. A metaphase position at the spindle equator, according to the model, requires equal numbers of kinetochore microtubules to both poles. Data from polarizing microscope images were not in accord with those predictions, leading to the conclusion that other factors, in addition to traction forces, must be involved in metaphase positioning in crane-fly spermatocytes. Although the identity of additional factors has not been established, one possibility is that polar ejection forces operate to exert away-from-the-pole forces that could counteract pole-directed traction forces. Another is that kinetochores are “smart,” meaning they embody a position-sensitive mechanism that controls their activity.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE MECHANISM OF CO-ORIENTATION IN BIVALENTS AND MULTIVALENTSHereditas, 2010
- Kinetochore fibre dynamics outside the context of the spindle during anaphaseNature Cell Biology, 2004
- Poleward Microtubule Flux Is a Major Component of Spindle Dynamics and Anaphase A in Mitotic Drosophila EmbryosCurrent Biology, 2002
- Rethinking anaphase: where ?Pac-Man? fails and why a role for the spindle matrix is likelyProtoplasma, 1996
- The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore.The Journal of cell biology, 1989
- Kinetochore microtubules in crane‐fly spermatocytes: Untreated, 2°C‐treated and 6°C‐grown spindlesCell Motility, 1986
- Bivalent orientation and behavior in crane‐fly spermatocytes recovering from cold exposureCell Motility, 1986
- Chromosome movement during meiotic prophase in crane‐fly spermatocytes. II. Analysis of polarization of chromosomes and their association with the nuclear envelopeCell Motility, 1983
- Analysis of birefringence and ultrastructure of spindles in primary spermatocytes of Nephrotoma suturalis during anaphaseJournal of Ultrastructure Research, 1976
- Birefringence and fine structure of spindles in spermatocytes of Nephrotoma suturalis at metaphase of first meiotic divisionJournal of Ultrastructure Research, 1974