Why is evidence-based medicine so harsh on vaccines? An exploration of the method and its natural biases
- 20 April 2007
- Vol. 25 (16) , 3165-3169
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.049
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influenza vaccination: policy versus evidenceBMJ, 2006
- So what has the Cochrane Collaboration ever done for us? A report card on the first 10 yearsCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- The evidence for the safety of thiomersal in newborn and infant vaccinesVaccine, 2003
- Pediatric Drug LabelingJAMA, 2003
- Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness in adultsVaccine, 2002
- Adverse events and vaccination-the lack of power and predictability of infrequent events in pre-licensure studyVaccine, 2001
- Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enoughThe Lancet, 1998
- Parameters potentially affecting interpretation of immunogenicity and efficacy data in vaccine trials: are they adequately reported?Vaccine, 1996
- Evidence-Based MedicineJAMA, 1992