Discrete Emotions or Dimensions? The Role of Valence Focus and Arousal Focus
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Emotion
- Vol. 12 (4) , 579-599
- https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379574
Abstract
The present study provides evidence that valence focus and arousal focus are important processes in determining whether a dimensional or a discrete emotion model best captures how people label their affective states. Individuals high in valence focus and low in arousal focus fit a dimensional model better in that they reported more co-occurrences among like-valenced affective states, whereas those lower in valence focus and higher in arousal focus fit a discrete model better in that they reported fewer co-occurrences between like-valenced affective states. Taken together, these findings suggest that one static, nomothetic theory may not accurately describe the subjective affective experience of all individuals.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A reviewPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995
- Facial expressions of emotion: What lies beyond minimal universality?Psychological Bulletin, 1995
- Pleasure-arousal theory and the intensity of emotions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- The varieties of emotional experience: A meditation on James-Lange theory.Psychological Review, 1994
- A Biopsychosocial Approach to Arousal RegulationJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1992
- Basic emotions: Theory and measurementCognition and Emotion, 1992
- Beyond attentional strategies: A cognitive-perceptual model of somatic interpretation.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990
- Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychological Review, 1962