Efficacy of lidocaine patch 5% in the treatment of focal peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in PAIN®
- Vol. 106 (1) , 151-158
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00317-8
Abstract
Peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes (PNPS) are difficult to treat because commonly used analgesics are often ineffective when, for example, touch-evoked allodynia, hyperalgesia, and pain paroxysms are present. To investigate whether lidocaine patch 5% treatment is also effective in postherpetic neuropathy (PHN) and in other PNPS, 40 patients with various forms and localizations of PNPS completed a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way, cross-over study in three medical hospitals. Patients suffering from pain in a localized skin area with intensity above 40 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and a stable consumption of pain medication were included in this study. The study was divided into four phases: 3-day run-in phase, treatment phase 1, wash-out period, and treatment phase 2, each lasting 1 week. At the discretion of the patients, up to four patches (covering a maximum of 560 cm2) were applied onto the maximally painful area for 12 consecutive hours daily, always either by day or at night. Throughout the four phases, ongoing pain, allodynia, quality of neuropathic symptoms, quality of sleep, and adverse events were assessed. When, after the wash-out period, the pain intensity scores did not return to the pre-treatment values (±20%), these patients were excluded from the study. The present study revealed that, as an add-on therapy, the lidocaine patch 5% was clearly effective in reducing ongoing pain (P=0.017) and allodynia (P=0.023) during the first 8 h after application and that the patches also worked well over a period of 7 days (P=0.018) in diverse focal PNPS. Calculation of the numbers needed to treat (NNT) to obtain one patient with more than 50% relief of ongoing pain revealed that the NNT of 4.4 in the present study compared reasonably well with other studies of PHN, such as topically applied capsaicin (NNT: 5.3–∞) or systemic treatment with gabapentin (NNT: 3.2–5.0).Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Overview of Neuropathic Pain: Syndromes, Symptoms, Signs, and Several MechanismsThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2002
- Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Peripheral Nerve DiseasePhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 2001
- Effect of Drugs Used for Neuropathic Pain Management on Tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+Currents in Rat Sensory NeuronsAnesthesiology, 2001
- Course of Symptoms and Quality of Life Measurement in Complex Regional Pain SyndromeJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2000
- Topical Lidocaine Patch Relieves a Variety of Neuropathic Pain Conditions: An Open-Label StudyThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2000
- Effects of single and repeated applications of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA®) cream on spontaneous and evoked pain in post-herpetic neuralgiaPain, 1999
- Development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic painNeurology, 1997
- Topical aspirin/diethyl ether mixture versus indomethacin and diclofenac/diethyl ether mixtures for acute herpetic neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia: a double-blind crossover placebo-controlled studyPAIN®, 1996
- Neuropathic pain of peripheral originNeurology, 1995
- The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effectBMJ, 1995