Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Asymptomatic Subjects' Thoracolumbar Range of Motion Using the OSI CA 6207 Spine Motion Analyzer
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- Published by Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
- Vol. 20 (4) , 207-212
- https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1994.20.4.207
Abstract
Because spinal range of motion (ROM) is assessed routinely in clinical and research settings, a technique is needed that can be performed comfortably, quickly, and reliably. The purpose of this study was to determine if ROM data from asymptomatic subjects measured with the OSI CA 6000 Spine Motion Analyzer (OSI SMA) are reliable within and between observers. Thoracolumbar ROM, from approximately T7 to S2, was measured in all three planes in eight male and 13 female asymptomatic adult subjects (mean age = 29.7 years, SD = 5.6; mean height = 1.7 m, SD = 3.4, mean weight = 78.25 kg, SD = 34.6). A standardized protocol was used to fit each subject with appropriate hardware. Foot placement at a comfortable foot angle was standardized by the use of a template. Subjects performed three practice trials of flexion, extension, right and left sidebending, and right and left rotation. During testing, subjects performed four trials of each maximal pain-free motion. The hardware was completely removed and replaced by the same examiner, and ROM trials in all three planes were repeated. The same procedure was completed by a second examiner. Repeated measures analysis of variance and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [2,1] were used to analyze intra- and interobserver data. Intraobserver ICCs were 0.89 or higher for all motions. Interobserver ICCs were 0.85 or higher for all motions. Measurements of thoracolumbar ROM using the OSI SMA are sufficiently reliable within and between observers for clinical assessment and research purposes.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- CommentaryPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1993
- Validity and Reliability of a Hand-Held Dynamometer with Two PopulationsJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1992
- Intrasession and Intersession Reliability of Hand-held Dynamometer Measurements Taken on Brain-damaged PatientsPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1989
- Reliability of the Attraction Method for Measuring Lumbar Spine Backward BendingPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1987
- Reliability of a Noninvasive Method for Measuring the Lumbar CurveJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1986
- Intertester Reliability for Selected Clinical Tests of the Sacroiliac JointPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1985
- Objective Assessment with Establishment of Normal Values for Lumbar Spinal Range of MotionPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1983
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- MEASUREMENT OF SPINAL MOBILITY: ACOMPARISON OF THREE METHODSRheumatology, 1975
- Measurement of back movement.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1969