Socioeconomic Factors and the Presentation, Management, and Outcome of Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Thyroid®
- Vol. 12 (11) , 1009-1016
- https://doi.org/10.1089/105072502320908358
Abstract
To determine whether patients from disadvantaged socioeconomic groups present with more advanced thyroid carcinoma or experience differing management and clinical outcomes, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 292 patients seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center and Ben Taub General Hospital between 1987 and 1994. At diagnosis, the mean age was 42 ± 16 years, 78% of patients were female, 76% of patients were low risk (TNM stage I or II), and 22% high risk (stage III or IV). Neighborhood income (± standard error of the mean [SEM]) (1990 census data) was lower in the high-risk group compared with the low-risk group ($26,200 ± 1,670 vs. $30,900 ± 870, p = 0.012). Men were more likely than women to present at an older age (47.5 ± 16.7 vs. 40.2 ± 16.0, p = 0.0014) and in the high-risk group (46% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001). No socioeconomic factor (ethnicity, marital status, occupation prestige, neighborhood income, insurance type) influenced initial diagnostic assessment. Similarly, no socioeconomic factor influenced initial disease management or the type of follow-up received over the 12-year period. Married patients had a lower 5-year recurrence rate than those unmarried (18% vs. 32%, p = 0.03); however, this did not affect overall or disease-specific survival. Similarly, ethnicity, marital status, occupation prestige, and insurance type did not influence overall or disease-specific survival. Although 10-year overall survival rates were lower in patients in the lowest income quartile (57% vs. 70% for upper, p = 0.0024) and in men compared with women (39% vs. 76%, p < 0.0001), gender alone influenced 10-year disease-specific survival (80% for men, 89% for women, p = 0.047). In summary, no socioeconomic factor appears to affect initial treatment or follow-up pattern in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Income and gender may affect stage at initial disease presentation and may be risk factors affecting eventual clinical outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Occupation a Risk Factor for Thyroid Cancer?Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2000
- Social factors, treatment, and survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Prognostic factors for thyroid carcinomaCancer, 1997
- Multivariate analysis of histopathological features as prognostic factors in patients with papillary thyroid carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Socioeconomic status and attitudes of 51 patients with giant basal and squamous cell carcinoma and paired controlsArchives of Dermatology, 1995
- Privilege and Health -- What Is the Connection?New England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Stage at diagnosis in breast cancer: race and socioeconomic factors.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.American Journal of Public Health, 1992
- Ethnic patterns of thyroid cancer incidence in the United States, 1973‐1981International Journal of Cancer, 1988
- A prognostic index for thyroid carcinoma. A study of the E.O.R.T.C. thyroid cancer cooperative groupPublished by Elsevier ,1979