Comparison of Heyman packing and Cathetron afterloading methods in the treatment of endometrial cancer
- 1 May 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 58 (689) , 437-441
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-58-689-437
Abstract
The five-year survival and the complication rate were evaluated in 307 patients with endometrial carcinoma treated from 1966 to 1977. The distribution of the patients into clinical stages I, II, III and IV was 68.7, 20.8, 6.5 and 3.9%, respectively. In stage I 87.2% and in stage II 67.2% of the patients were operated on. All patients received oral medroxyprogesterone acetate for two years, and all patients with stage I or II disease were also irradiated, mostly intracavitarily before operation. The crude 5-year survival in the total material was 72.0%, and for clinical stages I, II, III and IV 83.8, 54.7, 40.0 and 8.3%, respectively. 167 patients in stage I received intracavitary irradiation, 86 using the Heyman packing method and 81 using the Cathetron after-loading technique. The corresponding figures for 54 patients in stage II were 38 and 16. In clinical stage I the crude (83.9% and 84.2%, respectively) and corrected (92.9 and 88.9%, respectively) 5-year survivals were similar in the Heyman and Cathetron groups. In stage II better results were obtained using the Cathetron technique (crude 75.0 vs. 42.1%) but in the corrected material, excluding the unoperated cases, there was no significant difference (81.3 vs. 74.4%, respectively). Serious late complications requiring surgical correction were less common in the Cathetron group (2.9% vs. 11.1%; p < 0.05). The intracavitary irradiation of endometrial carcinoma can thus be well accomplished by remote afterloading technique.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma: Treatment results in 835 patientsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983
- Endometrial cancer: Evaluation of spread and follow-up in one hundred eighty-nine patients with Stage I or Stage II diseaseAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- Complications Following High and Low Dose-Rate Intracavitary Radiotherapy for St. I-II Endometrial Carcinoma: A Comparison of Remotely Afterloaded CO60(Cathetron) and Conventional Radium TherapyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1981
- Carcinoma of the endometrium: Effect of stage and grade on survivalCancer, 1978
- The management of clinical stage I endometrial carcinomaCancer, 1978
- A generalized Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorshipBiometrika, 1970
- INTRACAVITARY RADIATION THERAPY OF CANCER OF THE UTERINE CERVIX BY REMOTE AFTERLOADING WITH CYCLING SOURCESAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1966
- “Afterloading” Applicator for Radiation Therapy of Carcinoma of the UterusRadiology, 1960
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958
- The Radiumhemmet Experience with Radiotherapy in Cancer of the Corpus of the UterusActa Radiologica, 1941