A new approach to referees' assessments of manuscripts
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science Research
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-16
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089x(90)90012-8
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Model for Agreement Between Ratings on an Ordinal ScaleBiometrics, 1988
- The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making ProcessAmerican Sociological Review, 1987
- The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data Having Ordered and/or Unordered Categories: Association Models, Correlation Models, and Asymmetry Models for Contingency Tables With or Without Missing EntriesThe Annals of Statistics, 1985
- Using Association Models in Sociological Research: Some ExamplesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1982
- Criteria for Determining Whether Certain Categories in a Cross-Classification Table Should Be Combined, with Special Reference to Occupational Categories in an Occupational Mobility TableAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- Reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist: A biostatistical assessment of the data.American Psychologist, 1980
- Simple Models for the Analysis of Association in Cross-Classifications having Ordered CategoriesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979
- Interrater agreement on manuscript is not so badp.American Psychologist, 1978
- Assessing Inter-Rater Reliability for Rating Scales: Resolving some Basic IssuesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data: Independence, Quasi-Independence, and Interactions in Contingency Tables with or Without Missing EntriesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1968