Measuring the success of electronic medical record implementation using electronic and survey data.
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- p. 309-13
Abstract
Computerization of physician practices is increasing. Stakeholders are demanding demonstrated value for their Electronic Medical Record (EMR) implementations. We developed survey tools to measure medical office processes, including administrative and physician tasks pre- and post-EMR implementation. We included variables that were expected to improve with EMR implementation and those that were not expected to improve, as controls. We measured the same processes pre-EMR, at six months and 18 months post-EMR. Time required for most administrative tasks decreased within six months of EMR implementation. Staff time spent on charting increased with time, in keeping with our anecdotal observations that nurses were given more responsibility for charting in many offices. Physician time to chart increased initially by 50%, but went down to original levels by 18 months. However, this may be due to the drop-out of those physicians who had a difficult time charting electronically.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent implementations of electronic medical records in four family practice residency programsAcademic Medicine, 1997
- The sixth level of electronic health records: a look beyond the screen.1997
- Implementation and termination of a computerized medical information system.1996
- Family practice educators' perceptions of computer-based patient records.1995
- Introduction of an automated medical record at an HMO clinic.1994
- The relationship between planned change and successful implementation of computer assisted instruction.1992