A randomized, controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 25 (4) , 567-574
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199704000-00004
Abstract
To compare a practice of protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation implemented by nurses and respiratory therapists with traditional physician-directed weaning. Randomized, controlled trial. Medical and surgical intensive care units in two university-affiliated teaching hospitals. Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (n = 357). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either protocol-directed (n = 179) or physician-directed (n = 178) weaning from mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome measure was the duration of mechanical ventilation from tracheal intubation until discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Other outcome measures included need for reintubation, length of hospital stay, hospital mortality rate, and hospital costs. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 35 hrs for the protocol-directed group (first quartile 15 hrs; third quartile 114 hrs) compared with 44 hrs for the physician-directed group (first quartile 21 hrs; third quartile 209 hrs). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients randomized to protocol-directed weaning had significantly shorter durations of mechanical ventilation compared with patients randomized to physician-directed weaning (chi squared = 3.62, p = .057, log-rank test; chi squared = 5.12, p = .024, Wilcoxon test). Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, adjusting for other covariates, showed that the rate of successful weaning was significantly greater for patients receiving protocol-directed weaning compared with patients receiving physician-directed weaning (risk ratio 1.31; 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.50; p = .039). The hospital mortality rates for the two treatment groups were similar (protocol-directed 22.3% vs. physician-directed 23.6%; p = .779). Hospital cost savings for patients in the protocol-directed group were $42,960 compared with hospital costs for patients in the physician-directed group. Protocol-guided weaning of mechanical ventilation, as performed by nurses and respiratory therapists, is safe and led to extubation more rapidly than physician-directed weaning. (Crit Care Med 1997; 25:567-574)Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanical Ventilation with or without 7-Day Circuit ChangesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Challenges for the future: the nurse's role in weaning patients from mechanical ventilationIntensive and Critical Care Nursing, 1995
- A Comparison of Four Methods of Weaning Patients from Mechanical VentilationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Weaning from Ventilatory SupportNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Comparison of three methods of gradual withdrawal from ventilatory support during weaning from mechanical ventilation.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaJAMA, 1993
- Weaning from Mechanical VentilationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958