High Affinity Binding and Regulatory Actions of Dexamethasone-Type I Receptor Complexes in Mouse Brain*

Abstract
It is often implied that the various molecular, physiological, and behavioral responses to the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) are mediated in brain exclusively via the interactions of this synthetic steroid with the classical glucocorticoid (type II) receptor. The results reported in this study, however, suggest this generalization may, at least for the female mouse, be too restrictive. In the first experiment we compared the efficacy of the mineralocorticoid aldosterone (ALDO) with that of DEX to measure the classical mineralocorticoid (type I) receptor in brain cytosol. Since both of these steroids also bind to type II receptors, our assays included the type II receptor-selective ligand, RU26988. Whereas the specific binding of ALDO to type I receptors was largely unaffected by a 10-fold increase in the concentration of RU26988 (50- vs. 500-fold excess), there was a dramatic reduction in the specific binding of DEX. In a follow-up experiment. Scatchard analyses were used to confirm the differential affinity of RU26988 for DEX- vs. ALDO-type I receptor-binding sites and to reveal that the affinity of type I receptors for DEX (Kd .apprx. 0.83 nM) was nearly as high as it was for ALDO (Kd .apprx. 0.46 nM). A series of competition studies indicated that the competitive affinity (Kdc) of DEX for the ALDO-binding site was eqivalent to the Kd computed in the saturation analyses, thus suggesting that the high affinity binding sites for DEX and ALDO on type I receptors may be equivalent or at least overlapping. The binding of DEX to these high affinity sites may prove to be important, since the systemic administration of this steroid was found to down-regulate both type I and type II receptors in a number of brain regions. Because coadministration of the type I receptor antagonist RU26752 was shown to block these actions on type I, but not type II receptors, the formation of the DEX-type I receptor complex appears to be required for DEX-induced type I receptor down-regulation. An analysis of the in vitro efficacy of ALDO-vs. DEX-type I receptor transformation suggests that whereas there is a significant increase in the binding of both complexes to DNA-cellulose after treatment with thiocyanate, there is also a dramatic decrease in the stability of DEX- but not ALDO-type I receptor binding. We contend that it is this decrease in binding stability that mediates the DEX-induced down-regulation of type I receptors. In conclusion, we feel that the high affinity binding of DEX to both type I and type II receptors may be important in our interpretation of the complex action of this steroid in brain and possibly other tissues.