Colorectal cancer screening in the UK: Joint Position Statement by the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Physicians, and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
Open Access
- 1 June 2000
- Vol. 46 (6) , 746-748
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.46.6.746
Abstract
It is thought that 70–90% of cases of colorectal cancer arise from premalignant (adenomatous) polyps.5 They often have a stalk which consists of healthy tissue and allows them to be removed simply and completely by endoscopic snaring. This polyp to cancer sequence adds a strong intellectual argument in support of screening for colon cancer as it provides an opportunity not only to achieve early diagnosis (for example of Dukes' stage A carcinomas) but actually to prevent cancer development by removal of premalignant polyps.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screeningGut, 1999
- Is colonoscopy needed for the nonadvanced adenoma found on sigmoidoscopy?Gastroenterology, 1998
- Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screeningGut, 1998
- Potential costs of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based colorectal cancer screeningGastroenterology, 1996
- Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood testThe Lancet, 1996
- Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancerThe Lancet, 1996
- Reducing Mortality from Colorectal Cancer by Screening for Fecal Occult BloodNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopyThe Lancet, 1993
- Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Colorectal Cancer MortalityJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992
- Revision in American Cancer Society recommendations for the early detection of colorectal cancerCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1992