Sex of Supervisor, Sex of Subordinate, and Subordinate Job Satisfaction
- 23 June 1979
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Vol. 3 (4) , 391-399
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1979.tb00688.x
Abstract
It was hypothesized in the present research that there would be significant differences in the job satisfaction of subordinates depending upon the interaction between their sex and the sex of their supervisors. Using job satisfaction data from 139 employees, it was found that: (a) female subordinates supervised by male supervisors were less satisfied with supervision than those supervised by women, (b) females working under males reported a lower level of satisfaction with their co-workers than females supervised by females or males supervised by males, and (c) women who had female supervisors indicated a higher level of satisfaction with their work than men with male supervisors. Contrary to traditional stereotypes of women supervisors, the results suggested that these stereotypes might not be important in long-term, real-world situations.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex Stereotypes: An Artifact in Leader Behavior and Subordinate Satisfaction Analysis.The Academy of Management Journal, 1976
- Sex effects in evaluating leaders.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- Sex-role stereotypes of feminists and nonfeministsSex Roles, 1975
- Male Versus Female Leaders: The Effect of Leader Need for Dominance on Follower Satisfaction.The Academy of Management Journal, 1974
- LEADER BEHAVIOR OF MALE AND FEMALE SUPERVISORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY1Personnel Psychology, 1972
- Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal1Journal of Social Issues, 1972
- Male Managers' Attitudes Toward Working WomenAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1971
- Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate analysis of variance procedures.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Sex differences in job satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1964
- Industrial psychology.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1961