EVOLUTION OF NICHE WIDTH AND ADAPTIVE DIVERSIFICATION
- 1 December 2004
- Vol. 58 (12) , 2599-2612
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01614.x
Abstract
Theoretical models suggest that resource competition can lead to the adaptive splitting of consumer populations into diverging lineages, that is, to adaptive diversification. In general, diversification is likely if consumers use only a narrow range of resources and thus have a small niche width. Here we use analytical and numerical methods to study the consequences for diversification if the niche width itself evolves. We found that the evolutionary outcome depends on the inherent costs or benefits of widening the niche. If widening the niche did not have costs in terms of overall resource uptake, then the consumer evolved a niche that was wide enough for disruptive selection on the niche position to vanish; adaptive diversification was no longer observed. However, if widening the niche was costly, then the niche widths remained relatively narrow, allowing for adaptive diversification in niche position. Adaptive diversification and speciation resulting from competition for a broadly distributed resource is thus likely if the niche width is fixed and relatively narrow or free to evolve but subject to costs. These results refine the conditions for adaptive diversification due to competition and formulate them in a way that might be more amenable for experimental investigations.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- The flowerpiercers' hook: an experimental test of an evolutionary trade-offProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2003
- The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversityJournal of Evolutionary Biology, 2002
- Geographic Variation in Host Specificity Reveals Host Range Evolution in Uroleucon ambrosiae AphidsEcology, 2001
- NEURAL LIMITATIONS IN PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECTS: Implications for Diet Breadth and Evolution of Host AffiliationAnnual Review of Entomology, 2001
- Competitive Speciation in Quantitative Genetic ModelsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2000
- High Competition with Low Similarity and Low Competition with High Similarity: Exploitative and Apparent Competition in Consumer‐Resource SystemsThe American Naturalist, 1998
- The Evolution Of Ecological SpecializationAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1988
- METABOLIC COST OF CHANGES IN DIET AND NEUTRALIZATION OF ALLELOCHEMICSEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1978
- Some Methods for Calculating Competition Coefficients from Resource-Utilization SpectraThe American Naturalist, 1974
- How To Be a PredatorAmerican Zoologist, 1968