Sequence and practical reasoning in accounts episodes
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 35 (1) , 67-83
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378709369671
Abstract
When problematic events arise persons often account for their actions (i.e., offer an excuse or justification) in order to repair or modify potentially negative meanings. The main research question here is, How are accounts episodes organized as a communicative practice? Accounts episodes involve minimally a three‐part sequence: problematic event—accounts—evaluation. To go beyond a sequential model, accounts may be seen as a local solution to the problematic based on persons' practical reasoning to prevent the loss of face. Naturally occurring accounts episodes collected by field notes are used in the analysis and construction of this account model.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accounts as a reconstruction of an event's contextCommunication Monographs, 1985
- Account analysis of influence in group decision‐makingCommunication Monographs, 1984
- Account sequences in conversations between strangersCommunication Monographs, 1983
- THE MANAGEMENT OF FAILURE EVENTS: SOME CONTEXTUAL DETERMINANTS OF ACCOUNTING BEHAVIORHuman Communication Research, 1983
- Where do constitutive rules for speech acts come from?Language & Communication, 1981
- Remediation and legislation in everyday talk: How communicators achieve consensusQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1980
- SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONHuman Communication Research, 1975
- A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for ConversationLanguage, 1974
- The Honoring of AccountsAmerican Sociological Review, 1974
- Accountability and AnswerabilityJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1972