Photoperiodism in Lemna: Reversal of Night-Interruption Depends on Color of the Main Photoperiod
- 9 December 1966
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 154 (3754) , 1360-1362
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3754.1360
Abstract
With main photoperiods of red or white light, the inhibition of flowering in Lemna perpusilla 6746 caused by interruptions of the night with red light cannot be reversed by far-red light, since far-red light itself is highly inhibitory. However, with a main photoperiod of blue light, far-red light is much less inhibitory and partially reverses the effect of red night-interruptions. If the main blue photoperiod is terminated by a brief red exposure, reversibility is abolished, as the far-red light is again fully inhibitory. This latter effect can be reversed by far-red light. These results add light quality to the already known characteristics of the main light period which affect reversibility in the dark period, and are consistent with the idea that the effects of blue light on photoperiodism in L. perpusilla are mediated exclusively by phytochrome.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- TWO LIGHT REACTIONS IN THE PHOTOPERIODIC CONTROL OF FLOWERING OF LEMNA PERPUSILLA AND L. GIBBAPlant and Cell Physiology, 1966
- Roles of Active Phytochrome in Control of Flowering of Xanthium pensylvanicumBotanical Gazette, 1964
- Conditions Determining Effects of Far-Red and Red Irradiations on Flowering Response of Pharbitis nilPlant Physiology, 1964
- Dark reactions in the flowering ofLemna perpusilla 6746Planta, 1961
- Failure of Photoreversible Control of Flowering in Pharbitis nilBotanical Gazette, 1960
- EXPERIMENTAL CONTROL OF FLOWERING IN LEMNA I. GENERAL METHODS. PHOTOPERIODISM IN L. PEPUSILLA 6746American Journal of Botany, 1959
- Photoreversibility of Flower Initiation.Plant Physiology, 1956