Problems with Interval Estimation When Data are Adjusted via Calibration
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Quality Technology
- Vol. 20 (4) , 233-247
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1988.11979116
Abstract
The analysis of adjusted data arising from a linear calibration curve is considered. Although it is obvious that adjusted values contain errors due to estimation of the calibration curve, some investigators may be tempted to analyze such data as if they are true values of the property of interest. We illustrate some of the problems that arise if one applies “naive” analyses to calibrated data. In particular, it is shown that standard one-sample confidence intervals have actual confidence levels that are always less than the nominal value. We also propose and evaluate two other methods for constructing confidence intervals. Tolerance intervals derived from adjusted data also may yield deceiving results, having actual probability levels that are usually greater than the desired level but smaller in some cases.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement Error ModelsPublished by Wiley ,1987
- Tolerance Limits and Bounds for Proportions Based on Data Subject to Measurement ErrorJournal of Quality Technology, 1984
- Removing the Effects of Measurement Errors in Constructing Statistical Tolerance IntervalsJournal of Quality Technology, 1984
- Effect of Measurement Error and Instrument Bias on Operating Characteristics for Variables Sampling PlansJournal of Quality Technology, 1983
- Removing Measurement Error in Assessing Conformance to SpecificationsJournal of Quality Technology, 1982
- On the ratio of two correlated normal random variablesBiometrika, 1969
- Ratios of Normal Variables and Ratios of Sums of Uniform VariablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1965