Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders
Open Access
- 15 July 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 97 (8) , 463-475
- https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hch084
Abstract
Difficulty in walking is a major feature of neurological disease, and loss of mobility is the activity of daily living on which patients place the most value.1 Consequently, how to measure and assess this is of importance to any member of the inter-disciplinary team. In clinical practice, the World Health Organization international classification of functioning (ICF)2 is often adopted as the underlying framework for the assessment of mobility, which is an individual's ability to move about effectively in their environment.2 The ICF also introduces the constructs of performance (what an individual does in his environment) and capacity (ability to execute a task or action). This has a clear impact on the current methodology for the assessment of mobility. Different pathologies and impairments culminate in abnormal or reduced walking. For instance, in multiple sclerosis (MS), impairments such as weakness and spasticity from pyramidal tract lesions, loss of proprioception and co-ordination from dorsal column and cerebellar lesions, vestibular and visual dysfunction, cognitive and mood disturbance and pain may all contribute (Figure 1). In primary muscle disease, mobility is determined by weakness but secondary factors such as weight gain, contractures, fatigue and breathlessness may have important impacts. The degree of impairment has a non-linear relationship with activity and participation. For example leg strength and walking speed are poorly correlated,3 while many personal and environmental factors may influence the impact of similar degrees of loss of walking on mobility. Figure 1. Framework of international classification of function (ICF) as illustrated by mobility in MS. Impaired walking can be a marker of both disability and disease progression, and is therefore an important outcome measure in the treatment and rehabilitation of diseases such as MS and Parkinson's disease (PD). In some cases, measurement of mobility may have a direct influence on access to treatment. … Address correspondence to Dr O.R. Pearson, Section of Neurology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4XN. e-mail: pearsonor{at}cardiff.ac.ukKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Puberty: What Is Normal and When Is Treatment Indicated?Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 2003
- Test–Retest reliability of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale in patients with early Parkinson's disease: Results from a multicenter clinical trialMovement Disorders, 2002
- Day-to-day variability of maximum walking distance in MS patients can mislead to relevant changes in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS): average walking speed is a more constant parameterMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 2001
- Step activity monitor: Increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activityJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1999
- The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessmentMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 1999
- The Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS): a new disability measure for multiple sclerosisMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 1999
- The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor AssessmentInternational Disability Studies, 1991
- Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1983
- Intensive Immunosuppression in Progressive Multiple SclerosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease.BMJ, 1982