Standards for Statistical Models Used for Public Reporting of Health Outcomes
Top Cited Papers
- 24 January 2006
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 113 (3) , 456-462
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.170769
Abstract
With the proliferation of efforts to report publicly the outcomes of healthcare providers and institutions, there is a growing need to define standards for the methods that are being employed. An interdisciplinary writing group identified 7 preferred attributes of statistical models used for publicly reported outcomes. These attributes include (1) clear and explicit definition of an appropriate patient sample, (2) clinical coherence of model variables, (3) sufficiently high-quality and timely data, (4) designation of an appropriate reference time before which covariates are derived and after which outcomes are measured, (5) use of an appropriate outcome and a standardized period of outcome assessment, (6) application of an analytical approach that takes into account the multilevel organization of data, and (7) disclosure of the methods used to compare outcomes, including disclosure of performance of risk-adjustment methodology in derivation and validation samples.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: A Position ArticleThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Procedural Volume as a Marker of Quality for CABG SurgeryJAMA, 2004
- Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critiqueThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Why Do Hospital Death Rates Vary?New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- The Risks of Risk AdjustmentPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- The Risk of Determining Risk with Multivariable ModelsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1993
- Accuracy in Recorded DiagnosesJAMA, 1992
- Interpreting Hospital Mortality DataPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Assessment and AccountabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988