Word frequency effect and recognition memory in dementia of the alzheimer type
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Vol. 5 (2) , 97-104
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638308401157
Abstract
Normal persons show better recognition memory for rare than for common words. In the 1st experiment, this word frequency effect was examined in 17 patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) and 20 normal controls of equivalent age and education. The DAT patients showed a normal tendency to false alarm to common words but failed to show the normal rare word advantage in their hit rate. In a 2nd experiment, normal memory was examined immediately and after a delay of 2 wk when it is approximately equivalent to that of DAT patients. There was no attenuation of the usual rare word advantage. DAT patients fail to encode the featural and intrastructural elements of to-be-remembered verbal information, and this processing deficit may contribute to their impaired recognition memory performance.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Similarity Between Weak Normal Memory and Amnesia With Two and Eight Choice Word Recognition: A Signal Detection AnalysisCortex, 1981
- How Similar is the Effect of Cueing in Amnesics and in Normal Subjects Following Forgetting?Cortex, 1981
- Anterograde amnesia and memory for temporal orderNeuropsychologia, 1981
- Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review, 1980
- Structure and search of the internal lexiconJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979
- Models of word recognitionCognitive Psychology, 1979
- Predictors of mortality in presenile and senile dementiaAnnals of Neurology, 1978
- Recognition Memory in Amnesic Patients: Effect of Temporal Context and Familiarity of MaterialCortex, 1976
- Impaired Recall and the Memory Disturbance in Presenile DementiaBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1975
- Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951