Cowards and Heroes: Group Loyalty in the American Civil War
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Vol. 118 (2) , 519-548
- https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303321675446
Abstract
What motivated men to risk death in the most horrific war in U. S. history when pay was low and irregular and military punishment strategies were weak? In such a situation creating group loyalty by promoting social capital is of paramount importance and in the Civil War was the cement of both armies. We find that individual and company socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, ideology, and morale were important predictors of group loyalty in the Union Army. Company characteristics were more important than ideology or morale. Soldiers in companies that were more homogeneous in ethnicity, occupation, and age were less likely to shirk.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding the American Decline in Social Capital, 1952–1998Kyklos, 2003
- Semiparametric regression analysis for clustered failure time dataBiometrika, 2000
- Sect, Subsidy, and Sacrifice: An Economist's View of Ultra-Orthodox Jews*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000
- Participation in Heterogeneous Communities*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000
- Peer Pressure and PartnershipsJournal of Political Economy, 1992
- Desertion as Localism: Army Unit Solidarity and Group Norms in the U.S. Civil WarSocial Forces, 1991
- The Northern Soldier and His CommunityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Community and War: The Civil War Experience of Two New Hampshire TownsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Have Social Historians Lost the Civil War? Some Preliminary Demographic SpeculationsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Heights of Native-Born Whites During the Antebellum PeriodThe Journal of Economic History, 1983