A comparison of two RAST methods and skin prick testing in the diagnosis of wasp venom allergy
- 1 May 1989
- Vol. 44 (4) , 260-263
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1989.tb01067.x
Abstract
With the aim of evaluating the correlation between skin prick test and two radioallergosorbent tests (RAST) using paper (P-RAST) and Al (OH)3 (Al-RAST) as sorbent materials, 45 consecutive patients known to have been stung by wasp within 6 months were examined. Four patients had a normal reaction, four a large local reaction and 37 a systemic reaction. We found a good correlation between a systemic reaction and a positive P-RAST. Fifty-one per cent of patients with a systemic reaction had a negative Al-RAST, whereas only 8% had a negative P-RAST. Eight per cent of patients with a systemic reaction had a negative SPT. In the eight patients without a systemic reaction, the same patient reacted positively in Al-RAST and P-RAST.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Insect allergy. Predictive value of diagnostic tests: a three‐year follow‐up studyClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1986
- Evaluation of decline in serum venom-specific IgE as a criterion for stopping venom immunotherapyJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1986
- Venom skin tests in insect-allergic and insect-nonallergic populationsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1985
- Are confusion and controversy about food hypersensitivity really necessary?Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1985
- Insect AllergyAllergy, 1984
- Skin and radioallergosorbent tests in patients with sensitivity to bee and wasp venomClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1984
- The Allergy PrickerAllergy, 1982
- Evaluation of Hymenoptera-sting sensitivity with deliberate sting challenges: inadequacy of present diagnostic methodsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1982
- A New Lancet for Skin Prick TestingAllergy, 1979
- A Controlled Trial of Immunotherapy in Insect HypersensitivityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978