Stimulus Selectivity of Figural Aftereffects for Faces.
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Vol. 31 (3) , 420-437
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.420
Abstract
Viewing a distorted face induces large aftereffects in the appearance of an undistorted face. The authors examined the processes underlying this adaptation by comparing how selective the aftereffects are for different dimensions of the images including size, spatial frequency content, contrast, and color. Face aftereffects had weaker selectivity for changes in the size, contrast, or color of the images and stronger selectivity for changes in contrast polarity or spatial frequency. This pattern could arise if the adaptation is contingent on the perceived similarity of the stimuli as faces. Consistent with this, changing contrast polarity or spatial frequency had larger effects on the perceived identity of a face, and aftereffects were also selective for different individual faces. These results suggest that part of the sensitivity changes underlying the adaptation may arise at visual levels closely associated with the representation of faces.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptation to natural facial categoriesNature, 2004
- Fitting the mind to the WorldPsychological Science, 2003
- It's Pat! Sexing faces using only red and greenJournal of Vision, 2001
- Text-contingent color aftereffects: A reexaminationPerception & Psychophysics, 1994
- Color aftereffect contingent on textPerception & Psychophysics, 1989
- Configurational Information in Face PerceptionPerception, 1987
- Prototype formation of faces: A case of pseudo‐memoryBritish Journal of Psychology, 1981
- Margaret Thatcher: A New IllusionPerception, 1980
- Size Adaptation: A New AftereffectScience, 1969
- Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969