Design of Cluster-Randomized Trials of Quality Improvement Interventions Aimed at Medical Care Providers
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 45 (10) , S38-S43
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e318070c0a0
Abstract
Randomized trials aimed at improving the quality of medical care often randomize the provider. Such trials are frequently embedded in health care systems with available automated records, which can be used to enhance the design of the trial. We consider how available information from automated records can address each of the following concerns in the design of a trial: whether to randomize individual providers or practices; clustering of outcomes among patients in the same practice and its impact on study size; expected heterogeneity in adherence and the response to the intervention; eligibility criteria and the trade-offs between generalizability and internal validity; and blocking or matching to alleviate covariate imbalance across practices. Investigators can use available information from an automated database to estimate the amount of clustering of patients within providers and practices, and these estimates can inform the decision on whether to randomize at the level of the patient, the provider, or the practice. We illustrate calculation of the anticipated design effect for a proposed cluster-randomized trial and its implications for sample size. With available claims data, investigators can apply focused eligibility criteria to exclude subjects and providers with expected low compliance or lower likelihood of benefit, although possibly at some loss of generalizability. Chance imbalances in covariates are more likely when randomization occurs at the level of the practice than at the level of the patient, so we propose a matching score to limit such imbalances by design. Challenges to compliance, expected small effects, and covariate imbalances are particularly likely in cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions. When such trials are embedded in medical systems with available automated records, use of these data can enhance the design of the trial.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving Care of Patients At-Risk for Osteoporosis: A Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Explained variation in a model of therapeutic decision making is partitioned across patient, physician, and clinic factorsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Osteoporosis action: design of the healthy bones project trialContemporary Clinical Trials, 2005
- Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2004
- Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journalsBMJ, 2003
- Academic Detailing to Improve Use of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics at an Academic Medical CenterArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2001
- Are distinctive ethical principles required for cluster randomized controlled trials?Statistics in Medicine, 2001
- Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993.American Journal of Public Health, 1995
- Improving Drug-Therapy Decisions through Educational OutreachNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983