Multi-Level Selection, Covariance and Contextual Analysis
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 55 (3) , 481-504
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/55.3.481
Abstract
Two alternative statistical approaches to modelling multi-level selection in nature, both found in the contemporary biological literature, are contrasted. The simple covariance approach partitions the total selection differential on a phenotypic character into within-group and between-group components, and identifies the change due to group selection with the latter. The contextual approach partitions the total selection differential into different components, using multivariate regression analysis. The two approaches have different implications for the question of what constitutes group selection and what does not. I argue that the contextual approach is theoretically preferable. This has important implications for a number of issues in the philosophical debate about the levels of selection.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- MULTILEVEL SELECTION AND THE PARTITIONING OF COVARIANCE: A COMPARISON OF THREE APPROACHESEvolution, 2004
- Pluralism, Entwinement, and the Levels of SelectionPhilosophy of Science, 2003
- Why Won't the Group Selection Controversy Go Away?The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2001
- Design and Interpretation of Experimental Studies of Interdemic Selection: A Reply to GettyThe American Naturalist, 1999
- Reproductive Conflicts and Levels of Selection in the Ant Pristomyrmex pungens: Contextual Analysis and Partitioning of CovarianceThe American Naturalist, 1995
- A Critical Review of Philosophical Work on the Units of Selection ProblemPhilosophy of Science, 1994
- Contextual Analysis of Models of Group Selection, Soft Selection, Hard Selection, and the Evolution of AltruismThe American Naturalist, 1992
- The Units of Selection and the Bases of SelectionPhilosophy of Science, 1991
- A Method for Analyzing Selection in Hierarchically Structured PopulationsThe American Naturalist, 1987
- Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group SelectionThe American Naturalist, 1985