Social policy, freedom and individuality
- 9 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australian Journal of Public Administration
- Vol. 63 (4) , 80-89
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00404.x
Abstract
Contemporary social policy lacks an account of the ends it serves. The reason for this is a laissez‐faire policy regime where property right overwhelms the right of each individual to be a self‐determining person. Laissez‐faire policy creates a scarcity of public resources where a universalistic social policy cannot be afforded. A narrowly targeted social policy designed for the poor prevails: it is one where the poor are subject to state coercion. In the more expansive social policy associated with social democracy, the outcome of equality is championed but there is no coherent account of how this end can be reconciled with achieving freedom. The universal idea of the self‐determining person is the basis of a rationale for social policy. Thus the end that social policy should serve is the development and sustaining of an individual who has the set of capabilities that he or she requires to be free in the sense of self‐determining.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Politics of UncertaintyPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- The ‘new contractualism’, social protection and the Yeatman thesisJournal of Sociology, 2002
- What is the role of social protection? A response to YeatmanJournal of Sociology, 2002
- The new contractualism and individualized personhoodJournal of Sociology, 2002
- Review Article: Social Rights and Social Contract—Political Theory and the New Welfare PoliticsBritish Journal of Political Science, 2000
- Who is the Subject of Human Rights?American Behavioral Scientist, 2000
- Women and Human DevelopmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2000
- Wealth and FreedomPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1995
- Virtue, Commerce, and HistoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1985