Carbon Storage and Land-use in Extractive Reserves, Acre, Brazil
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Environmental Conservation
- Vol. 19 (4) , 307-315
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892900031428
Abstract
Large-scale forest conversion in Brazil, primarily to cattle pasture, contributes significantly to the global anthropogenic emission of CO2 into the atmosphere. An alternative land-use, namely extractive reserves for forest residents, may serve as one means of using Amazonian forests sustainably and of maintaining carbon in living matter rather than adding it to that in the atmosphere.In the Seringal (former rubber estate) Porongaba (6,800 ha) of the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve, Acre, Brazil, primary forest still covers more than 90% of the area. Total biomass in primary forest is estimated at 426 tons per ha, equivalent to 213 t C per ha. Rubber tappers effectively maintain about 60,000 tons of carbon per household (family unit) in forest biomass and thus out of the atmosphere. Deforestation of primary forest was less than 0.6% per yr — much less than rates of natural disturbances for other neotropical forests.Slash-and-burn agriculture in the Seringal Porongaba releases carbon at a gross rate of some 200 t C per yr per household. Net releases are much less, as regrowth forests absorb carbon at rates of about 9 t C per ha per yr. The net areal flux of carbon to the atmosphere from land-use in Seringal is much less than one ton of carbon per ha per yr, which is equivalent to less than 0.3% per yr of the carbon stock in forest biomass. If Seringal Porongaba is typical of the three million hectares in extractive reserves in Brazilian Amazonia, then these reserves are calculated to retain 0.6 Gigatons of carbon in the terrestrial biota.Adverse changes in income patterns for rubber tappers could lead to abandonment of extractive reserves or increased deforestation within them. Diversification and improvement of income from non-timber forest products are needed to maintain rubber tappers in extractive reserves. Most beneficiaries of carbon storage in these and other reserves live outside Brazil; devising means of recompensation for these benefits is a challenge for the global society.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Limits of ExtractivismBioScience, 1992
- Changes in the landscape of Latin America between 1850 and 1985 II. Net release of CO2 to the atmosphereForest Ecology and Management, 1991
- Extractive reserves will not save tropicsBioScience, 1990
- The Rate and Extent of Deforestation in Brazilian AmazoniaEnvironmental Conservation, 1990
- Deforestation and Shrinking Crop Gene-pools in AmazoniaEnvironmental Conservation, 1990
- Extractive Reserves in Brazilian AmazoniaBioScience, 1989
- Tropical Deforestation and Climatic ChangeEnvironmental Conservation, 1988
- The flux of carbon from terrestrial ecosystems to the atmosphere in 1980 due to changes in land use: geographic distribution of the global fluxTellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 1987
- Biomass of Tropical Forests: A New Estimate Based on Forest VolumesScience, 1984
- The Biota and the World Carbon BudgetScience, 1978