HPV and circumcision: A biased, inaccurate and misleading meta-analysis
- 31 July 2007
- journal article
- other
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Infection
- Vol. 55 (1) , 91-93
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2007.02.009
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human papillomavirus and circumcision: A meta-analysisJournal of Infection, 2007
- Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trial of Male Circumcision for Reduction of HIV Infection Risk: The ANRS 1265 TrialPLoS Medicine, 2005
- Determinants of Prevalence, Acquisition, and Persistence of Human Papillomavirus in Healthy Mexican Military MenCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005
- Condom Use and Other Factors Affecting Penile Human Papillomavirus Detection in Men Attending a Sexually Transmitted Disease ClinicSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2004
- Prevalence and Determinants of Genital Infection with Papillomavirus, in Female and Male University Students in Busan, South KoreaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Evaluation of Genital Sites and Sampling Techniques for Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA in MenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Male Circumcision, Penile Human Papillomavirus Infection, and Cervical Cancer in Female PartnersNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysisAIDS, 2000
- Developmental factors of urethral human papillomavirus lesions: correlation with circumcisionBJU International, 1999
- Penile intraepithelial Neoplasia. Specific clinical features correlate with histologic and virologic findingsCancer, 1994