A Phantom Study of the Geometric Accuracy of Computed Tomographic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stereotactic Localization with the Leksell Stereotactic System
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurosurgery
- Vol. 48 (5) , 1092-1099
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200105000-00025
Abstract
To assess the spatial accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomographic stereotactic localization with the Leksell stereotactic system.The phantom was constructed in the shape of a box, 164 mm in each dimension, with three perpendicular arrays of solid acrylic rod, 5 mm in diameter and spaced 30 mm apart within the phantom. In this study, images from two different MRI scanners and a computed tomographic scanner were obtained using the same Leksell (Elekta Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden) head frame placement. The coordinates of the rod images in the three principal planes were measured by using a tool provided with Leksell GammaPlan software (Elekta Instruments, Norcross, GA) and were compared with the physical phantom measurements.The greatest distortion was found around the periphery, and the least distortion (<1.5 mm) was present in the middle and most other areas of the phantom. In the phantom study using computed tomography, the mean values of the maximum errors for the x, y, and z axes were 1.0 mm (range, 0.2-1.3 mm), 0.4 mm (range, 0.1-0.8 mm), and 3.8 mm (range, 1.9-5.1 mm), respectively. The mean values of the maximum errors when using the Philips MRI scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Shelton, CT) were 0.9 mm (range, 0.4-1.7 mm), 0.2 mm (range, 0.0-0.7 mm), and 1.9 mm (range, 1.3-2.3 mm), respectively. Using the Siemens MRI scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, New York, NY), these values were 0.4 mm (range, 0.0-0.7 mm), 0.6 mm (range, 0.0-1.0 mm), and 1.6 mm (range, 0.8-2.0 mm), respectively. The geometric accuracy of the MRI scans when using the Siemens scanner was greatly improved after the implementation of a new software patch provided by the manufacturer. The accuracy also varied with the direction of phase encoding.The accuracy of target localization for most intracranial lesions during stereotactic radiosurgery can be achieved within the size of a voxel, especially by using the Siemens MRI scanner at current specifications and with a new software patch. However, caution is warranted when imaging peripheral lesions, where the distortion is greatest.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of a Unique Phantom to Assess the Geometric Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stereotactic LocalizationNeurosurgery, 1999
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a multiinstitutional study using the gamma unitJournal of Neurosurgery, 1996
- Magnetic resonance image—directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracyJournal of Neurosurgery, 1995
- Effects of coregistration of MR to CT images on MR stereotactic accuracyJournal of Neurosurgery, 1995
- Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planningInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Stereotactic RadiosurgeryNeurosurgery, 1993
- A Comparison between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for Stereotactic Coordinate DeterminationNeurosurgery, 1992
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery of the Brain Using the First United States 201 Cobalt-60 Source Gamma KnifeNeurosurgery, 1989
- A new fixation device for the Leksell stereotaxic systemJournal of Neurosurgery, 1987
- Stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1983