Trauma systems. Current status--future challenges
- 24 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 259 (24) , 3597-3600
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.259.24.3597
Abstract
The national status of regional trauma system development was evaluated by a survey sent to all state emergency medical services directors and state chairpersons of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Eight essential components of a regional trauma system based on criteria set forth by the American College of Surgeons were listed. Only two states were found to have all components and statewide coverge. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia lacked one or more components of a regional trauma system. The remaining 29 states had yet to initial the process of trauma center designation. In response to these shortcomings, an attempt was made to define the barriers to trauma system implementation and a step-by-step process was outlined for the development, management, and analysis of a comprehensive system of trauma care.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Method for Evaluating Field Triage CriteriaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1986
- Utilization of medical care in orange county: The effect of implementation of a regional trauma systemAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1985
- Financial analysis of an inner city trauma center: Charges vs collectionsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1985
- Impact of RegionalizationArchives of Surgery, 1983
- Patterns of Death, Complication, and Error in the Management of Motor Vehicle Accident VictimsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1983
- Validation of Autopsy Method for Evaluating Trauma CareArchives of Surgery, 1982
- An Autopsy Method for Evaluating Trauma CarePublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1981