The Impact of Postdischarge Infection on Surgical Wound Infection Rates
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control
- Vol. 8 (6) , 237-240
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0195941700066108
Abstract
We undertook a study of postdischarge infections to assess the reliability of a surgical wound surveillance program in a 930-bed teaching hospital. During a six-month period, a subset of operations performed each day was randomly selected and patients interviewed by telephone one month postsurgery using a standard set of questions. The infection rate for all patients contacted directly postdischarge was 5.4%, whereas the surgical wound infection rate determined for all procedures through the standard hospital program was 1.5%. For day-surgery patients, who are not routinely followed in the hospital surveillance program, 8 (7.8%) of 103 patients contacted had infection. Thus, the overall surgical infection rate determined in this study was over three times higher than that calculated using standard surveillance. A reliable method for identifying postdischarge wound infections is necessary to ensure accurate surgical wound infection rates.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EFFICACY OF INFECTION SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL PROGRAMS IN PREVENTING NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN US HOSPITALSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Effect of methods of postdischarge wound infection surveillance on reported infection ratesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1983
- Effectiveness of a Surgical Wound Surveillance ProgramArchives of Surgery, 1983
- The Epidemiology of Wound Infection: A 10-Year Prospective Study of 62,939 WoundsSurgical Clinics of North America, 1980