Human Resource Management: A Multiparadigmatic Analysis
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Personnel Review
- Vol. 20 (4) , 3-14
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000000794
Abstract
The decade has witnessed unprecedented interest in what has been seen as a radically new direction in the management of people in organisations: human resource management (HRM). HRM has, however, been bedevilled by controversy and ambiguity to the extent of being regarded as just another “flavour of the month” management rhetoric. There is little consensus about what HRM means and what it entails in practice. Conceptual clarity is sought by adopting a multiparadigmatic approach to analyse HRM, which is classified into “hard” and “soft” variants. The use of paradigmatic “frames” or “lenses” enriches our understanding of them, and should enhance our appreciation of the implications of different approaches in the management of employees.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- HRM: A Case of the Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?Personnel Review, 1990
- HRM: An Ideological PerspectivePersonnel Review, 1990
- How Does Human Resources Management Change The Personnel Function?Personnel Review, 1988
- THE PEOPLE‐MANAGEMENT DIMENSION IN CURRENT PROGRAMMES OF ORGANISATIONAL CHANGEEmployee Relations, 1988
- Personnel Management in Recession and Recovery: A Comparative Analysis of What the Surveys SayPersonnel Review, 1988
- HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS[1]Journal of Management Studies, 1987
- Personnel and paradigms: four perspectives on the futureIndustrial Relations Journal, 1986
- The Practice of Strategic Human Resource ManagementPersonnel Review, 1986
- Images of Employees in Company Reports — Do Company Chairmen View their Most Valuable Asset as Valuable?Personnel Review, 1986
- Strategic Management in an Enacted WorldAcademy of Management Review, 1985